

Not totally dreadful

Inconsonant Description of How to Play RouletteThe description of how to play occupies a good 60% of the book, but numerous typographical errors, and worse yet, technical errors plague this description. For example, the five-number bet illustrated on page 21 isn't the correct five-number bet at all, but rather is a three-number bet on 0-2-00. This is real confusing for the first time roulette player, which is the only real target audience for this book.
In addition to technical errors and typographicals, there are many out-right contradictions. For example, on page 40 we read "What they don't know is that there is no law of averages.". On page 43, we read "... as we have shown, the game is one of pure chance governed by the law of averages...".
Only one common winning system is mentioned, the Martingale, and then the author turns around and says that it really isn't a good system because of losing streaks and suggests just "playing numbers". Why did the author not chose a "good system" and explain mathematically why it is a good system? Or is he trying to say that no such system exists and that the only way to win is not to play?
For those looking to learn to play roulette and then extend their knowledge to include a good description of some of the common winning systems, I'd have to suggest "All About Roulette" by John Gollehon and "Secrets of Winning Roulette" by Marten Jensen, rather than this book.


Nostalgic, Pre-1980 look back at the way it was.

Good book for beginners

Outdated

Warning--not the book that the title/description suggest!Perhaps if I had been a student of literature, I might have found this book interesting. However, as a reader who was looking for insight into the psychology of gambling, I was extremely disappointed, and, frankly, quite bored by this book.


insufficient coverage of betting tactics

Gambling anecdotes - but no "system"If you want a book that reads like a transcript of a gambler telling stories over drinks in a bar, name dropping old Vegas stars, talking about the big scores and the big losses, spouting opinions on lotteries and horses, and bragging about nailing hookers, by all means this is your book.
But if you're looking for advice on winning blackjack, look elsewhere.
The subtitle is "how to beat blackjack as a way of life." This is very misleading. There is good advice, mind you, but it's obvious and not worth filling a book. The advice is "quit winners." In any gambling situation, a player will go up and down. Quit when you're up. This is good advice, and it's what I already practice. But I didn't need to buy this book to tell me this.
As this is marketed as a book on playing blackjack, I'd think that instead of giving us the stats on high roller slot machines, or recounting keno stories, or any of the other endless off topic rants, there might be more about money management at the actual table. Showing me a "scorecard" listings wins at various casinos doesn't tell me how those positive numbers got there.
Congrats to Mr Levy on a nice brag book, admittedly getting publishing justification after two really good streaks. But by that standard, I guess I could write my own, having two streaks in a row.
I found much more helpful material for a casual player in Jerry Patterson's Blackjack: A Winner's Handbook. If you're a frequent player, you won't even take Levy's book seriously.


Casino management primer written at junior high school level

Good as an intro to roulette for beginners only.