

not worth buying
All Slots Are Not Created Equal!
Evening the OddsReaders are also offered a free newsletter and more gambling tips at Mitchell's web site. I feel better prepared for my next casino visit. Can't wait to try out her tips!


Review
My first
This book will help you win in a medium-skill game

DON'T BUY IT!Avoid this book.
An invaluable instruction guide and reference book
The best book on poker around!!!!!

Very poorly researched with questionable conclusions
this book surprised me
The names of the powerful don't necessarily end in vowels.The authors, criminal justice professors at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas, argue that the "Black Book", (the list of persons excluded from participation in legal gambling), is maintained by the State of Nevada for symbolic purposes, to assert an image of control and propriety.
The Black Book is further tainted by its focus on stereotypical ethnic types, largely Italian Americans, to the exclusion of others, like the Mormans, who actually wield great power in Nevada gaming but suffer no opprobrium as a result.
Interesting reading.


Full of gamblers' superstitions that are quite simply wrongFor example, Royer indicates that at a Black Jack table, the "Third Base" player helps determine whether the dealer will bust. Smart play by the 3rd baseman will help the other players at the table, while mistakes will hurt. Ridiculous!
The author describes a situation where the 3rd baseman has a 16 and the dealer shows a 6 with a 10 as a hole card. The 3rd baseman "stupidly" asks for a hit, and is dealt a 10 causing him to bust; then the dealer draws a 5 reaching 21. Thus, the 3rd baseman's draw causes the other players to almost certainly lose the hand. If the player had not hit, the dealer would draw the 10, bust, and everyone wins.
While this certainly could happen, it's just as easy to imagine the 5 and 10 being reversed in the deck. In this scenario, the Third Base player "stupidly" hits, stealing the 5 from the dealer for 21. The dealer will deal himself 10 busting with a total of 26. Our jerk 3rd baseman is now the hero.
(The only exception is if the player actually knows the next card in the deck. This would happen if the card is accidentally drawn from the shoe and flipped over. It could also happen if the player is a cheat or scammer.)
The author does at least indicate that with games like Roulette, the gambler's decisions have no impact on the game's outcome. Royer correctly explains that with the exception of a few very lucky gamblers, these games are a losing proposition in the long run. However, that doesn't stop him from sharing some bad advice.
In his chapter on Roulette, Royer advises splitting a bet between two numbers -- instead of betting 35:1 on one number, he suggests a 17:1 bet on two numbers. "The trick to winning in Roulette is not in maximizing your potential wins but in minimizing your certain losses." The truth is that with or without the split, the game's average payout remains the same (approx. 94.7% with a 38 number wheel). Royer gives the false impression that the gambler is playing "smart" and has increased his/her odds of walking away with a fortune; in actuality, nothing has changed. These are the kind of dumb players the casinos love.
Based on these and other bogus statements, I don't give this book any credibility. If you are looking for good advice on gambling, do not read this book. There are many better books out there, so don't put up with this rubbish.
Casino Magazine's Play Smart and WinIf you also read the review by Evan Salas, you will know exactly what I mean. Evan perfectly captured the point of that book, and why it was written in the way it was.
My new series of books takes a more detailed approach in many respects, and should satisfy even the diehard believers in the mathematics of gambling. This new series, from Kensington, starting January 2003, and continuing through 2004, focuses on teaching the games simply, while also serving the needs of those who wish to experience more in-depth details. Not all readers will like this, because I tell the truth of the reality of gambling, as opposed to those nice, easy, and very comfortable statistics that gamblers like Scott Miller seem to live by.
Here, I wish to let all readers know that the purpose of this 1994 book was to accomplish exactly what Evan Salas wrote in his review, and not what Scott Miller apparently thought the book should have been. Over the years, I have received hundreds of letters from readers all over the world who found my book informative, easy to understand, and helpful in learning what the casino games are, and how to enjoy them better.
Thank you to both Scott and Evan for your kind efforts in reviewing my book. I hope to offer my readers even more in my new series of books.
Sincerely,
Victor H. Royer
Author
The best!

Title is a Misprint
Move from Beginner to Intermediate
FOR BEGINNERS ONLY, BUT

A WASTE OF MONEY
Handy Guide
Great Overview for Beginners and Experienced Players

Don't Waste Your Money
Slot Machines
SHE'S A WINNER!!!!Read your book and did I ever LEARN!!! Soooo very nice to leave the casino grinning from ear to ear. Well, not every time, but 70% more.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge and insight. And, please,, keep writing about any more tips that come to mind. You just may make me rich one day.
-a frequent winner, Kathy


not so great
Mixed feelings
A more personal guide to playing poker

Interesting ideas but no proof
Strange and thought provoking . . .His system is his own spin-off from Basic Strategy called 'Percentage Play '
It's not THAT far off from Basic to qualify it as whacko--it's well.. 'contrarian'---for lack of a better word. One gets the feeling that if every expert predicts a Stock Market crash, Summers would buy . . .
Example from Chapter 20 "Splitting 10's":
"Do you really want to know why I'm leaning in the direction of splitting 10's?
Because in a lot of casinos today they offer classes. On every occasion the instructor says NEVER DO IT...If the casinos say never split 10's that's exactly what I want to do."
Ok, so Summers has unmasked the International Casino Conspiracy or his math is way off.
The greatest departure from convention comes in his advice about playing against aces showing; Stand if you hold a 13.
Why?
Because the dealer has a 39% chance of breaking, 31% of having Blackjack , 23% of being pat and 46% that he's drawing and IF the player can escape the 31% chance of the dealer having BJ,
(How? Prayer?) then it is 2 to 1 that the dealer has to draw to his hand!
Somehow this is better, according to Summers, than having the player risk the 39% chance that he will be the one to bust if he takes a card.
Same advice if you hold a 12 against an ace.
Since comp sims, statistical tables or any other objective proof is not offered, there's only one way to find out.
Buy the book, take out a couple of millions and bust the bank.
Who knows? The old coot may be right . . .
Learning Lots in Texas